The world is a stage. Let’s peek behind the curtains of that stage and see the real world — a world of PSYOPs and the only war that really matters: the war over your mind.
Every PSYOP Will Become Obvious
FREE MASTERCLASS: https://nci.university/10070 Are you being manipulated without even realizing it? In this video, we unveil the Manipulation Playbook-a detailed guide to recognizing the 20 indicators of reality control used by media, corporations, and even governments to shape what you think, feel, and do.
This post will be a little more abstract, and it will not be so much about geopolitics.
First, I want to say that I’m really sorry I haven’t been writing as much as before, but I’ve been a bit depressed, as I mentioned in my previous post. It’s been hard for me to stay motivated to write. There’s also so much going on in the world – I spend all my free time following the news and trying to understand what’s happening, which leaves me with little time to write.
I’ve written many times that if I had to describe my area of expertise, I’d say it’s psychology, behaviorism, and philosophy. In the past, I’ve written many posts about psychology and propaganda. I became interested in these topics a long time ago – almost twenty years ago – when I realized that we were being lied to about the war in Iraq. That discovery led me to the truth about 9/11 and later the JFK assassination.
Understanding those lies allowed me to peek behind the curtain of what I call the “reality of the naïve,” a false world created by propaganda. Once I realized the existence of this “reality of the naïve”, a question arose: How did they convince people to believe in those lies?
I wanted to understand how they could destroy the Twin Towers, kill 3,000 of their own citizens in front of our eyes, and then convince people to believe a story that breaks the basic laws of physics. When I looked into the JFK assassination, I found that it wasn’t the first time they had done something like this.
If I could understand how people’s minds work, maybe I could understand how they made people believe in this “reality of the naïve.” And if I could understand how they do it, maybe I could learn how to undo it. After all, what’s the point of understanding the truth about what’s really happening if people don’t live in the real world but instead live in the “reality of the naïve,” where facts and logic don’t matter?
I’ve been feeling depressed, partly because of things like what happened recently at work. I was talking with one of my older Polish coworkers about the recent events with drones flying over Poland. We argued because he said those were Russian drones. I explained that they had flown too far to have been launched from Russian territory – but of course, the laws of physics didn’t seem to matter.
So I said, “Okay, let’s assume they were Russian drones. Tell me, why would Russia attack NATO territory before defeating Ukraine completely, just to open another front against NATO before closing the first one in Ukraine?”
After a few minutes of discussion, when I dismantled all his arguments, he finally said, “Putin shot those drones into Poland to scare the Russian population,” which made no sense. When I proved that his arguments didn’t hold up, he simply created new, illogical ones to justify his assumptions. That shows how powerful this “reality of the naïve” is.
I also have Ukrainian coworkers, and I’ve tried to help them understand what’s really happening. I’ve argued with them, too, and those who follow my writing know that I have a lot of knowledge on this subject. I’ve tried to explain to them about the Odessa massacre, Victoria Nuland’s leaked call, and the discussions about how many people would need to die on Maidan for the color revolution to succeed. I mentioned Sikorski and many other things.
In response, they told me that it was all “Putin propaganda.” One of them even brought up Georgia and Russia, saying that Russia attacked Georgia. So I showed him a Reuters article about an independent investigation commissioned by the European Union, which concluded that Georgia had attacked Russia first:
Georgia started war with Russia: EU-backed report
An independent report blamed Georgia on Wednesday for starting last year’s five-day war with Russia, but said Moscow’s military response went beyond reasonable limits and violated international law.
I asked him, “Is Reuters owned by the Russian state? Is Reuters Russian propaganda?” No response – just “Putin bad.”
My Ukrainian friends and coworkers are suffering because of this war, and I’m trying to help them see that they’re being used by the West—or, as I call it, “Our Western Capitalist Empire of Evil.” But instead, they defend the war and call me a Putin supporter.
This is why I feel so depressed – because I see how powerful Western brainwashing is in maintaining this “reality of the naïve.”
But let’s get to the main subject.
Human Mind
I like the guy from the main video I added to this post, and I like his so-called “FATE” model. Still, he claims to be a specialist in psyops while clearly being manipulated by some psyops himself — as shown by the fact that he talks about global warming (sorry, not global warming — I meant climate change, lol) and by how he talks about using simplistic view of the “fight between good and evil” while showing images of Putin and Kim Jong Un in the background.
That said, many of the things he says in this video are true, and I do like the “FATE” model. In my opinion, though, emotions are the most important part of it, even though they appear at the end of the acronym. I understand that “FATE” sounds better than “EFAT.”
I already wrote many posts on this subject, but while he uses the phrase “the mammalian part of our brain,” I’ve more often heard it called “the reptilian part of our brain.”
Our consciousness and rationality are located at the top — in the neocortex. Before information reaches the conscious and logical part of the brain (the neocortex), it must pass through the reptilian brain and limbic brain.
Psyops and propaganda aim to capture and influence your reptilian and limbic brains before information reaches your neocortex, where rational thought and decision-making occur. That’s one of the main ways they manipulate people.
But there’s another layer. Within the neocortex, we don’t just have consciousness — we also have the subconscious, which plays a crucial role. This is best described in the following passage:
“It is chiefly the psychologists of the school of Freud who have pointed out that many of man’s thoughts and actions are compensatory substitutes for desires which he has been obliged to suppress. A thing may be desired not for its intrinsic worth or usefulness, but because he has unconsciously come to see in it a symbol of something else, the desire for which he is ashamed to admit to himself. A man buying a car may think he wants it for purposes of locomotion… He may really want it because it is a symbol of social position, an evidence of his success in business, or a means of pleasing his wife.”
— Edward Bernays, PropagandaWhat Freud suggested is that there is often a separation between our conscious thoughts and our hidden feelings or desires — the ones that don’t align with our self-image and are therefore suppressed.
Bernays recognized that this fact makes human beings manipulable. If one can design propaganda or psychological operations that bypass the conscious and rational mind — and instead target suppressed emotions and hidden desires — it’s possible to make people adopt beliefs and behaviors without realizing the true motivations behind them.
As Bernays explained:
“…men are very largely actuated by motives which they conceal from themselves… It is evident that the successful propagandist must understand the true motives and not be content to accept the reasons which men give for what they do.”
— Edward Bernays, Propaganda
So, within our neocortex, alongside consciousness, we also have subconscious processes — formed from the things we hide from ourselves.
But that’s not all. Beyond the individual mind, we also have herd mentality and group psychology, which are closely connected to conformity. This is well described by Gustave Le Bon:
When an individual becomes part of a crowd, according to Le Bon, he undergoes a profound psychological transformation. That is, he ceases to operate as an individual:
‘He is no longer himself, but has become an automaton who has ceased to be guided by his will.’”
— Gustave Le Bon, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind“It is crowds rather than isolated individuals that may be induced to run the risk of death to secure the triumph of a creed or an idea, that may be fired with enthusiasm for glory and honour… Such heroism is without doubt somewhat unconscious, but it is of such heroism that history is made.”
— Gustave Le Bon, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind
Explaining all of this in detail would take too long, but I wanted to at least outline the basic structure of the human mind and our decision-making processes — the very mechanisms used to manipulate us.
This ties into Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,”Arthur Schopenhauer’s “Will to Live” (which later evolved into Freud’s concept of the ego) and Carl Jung’s ideas of individuation, persona, and shadow.
Many thinkers have contributed to this understanding:
- Gustave Le Bon – crowd psychology and mass conformity
- John B. Watson – father of behaviorism
- B. F. Skinner – “operant conditioning”
- Edward Bernays – father of modern propaganda
There were of course many more but Bernays summarized our condition perfectly in his famous quote:
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.
In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
— Edward Bernays, Propaganda
I could write much more on this subject, but let’s end it here. I hope this outline of how our mind and decisions work is sufficient. I too often hear people telling me that their thoughts and decisions are entirely their own — without understanding how easily they can be influenced, just as the author of the main video says at the beginning:
“Most people have no awareness of how easily our behavior and even our identity can be completely taken over.”
Dialectic
The word “dialectic” has many meanings, but the one you may have heard recently is connected to Hegel’s dialectic and Marxist dialectics, often defined as:
“Dialectic as a method: Dialectics is not a fixed formula but a tool for understanding how social and economic phenomena are interconnected, developing, and changing over time.”
The dialectic being discussed today refers to understanding how society reacts through analyzing the interconnections between social and economic conditions. It’s closely related to all aspects of the human mind I mentioned earlier—such as the ego, crowd psychology, and operant conditioning.
This concept is well encapsulated in the following quote by B. F. Skinner:
“Now that we know how positive reinforcement works, and why negative doesn’t, we can be more deliberate and hence more successful, in our cultural design.
We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled, though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do.
That’s the source of the tremendous power of positive reinforcement—there’s no restraint and no revolt. By careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behave—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises.”
— B. F. Skinner, Walden Two
As this quote explains, the key is to “control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behave.”
To do this we need “dialectic” that’s often being mentioned today.
We live in what is called a democracy. Because of that, direct control — or “controlling the final behavior” — is impossible. If you try to force people to act in a certain way, rebellion or even revolution may follow. Therefore, the focus shifts toward controlling the inclination to behave.
To do that, one must understand what conditions will produce the desired inclinations. In other words, if we know how society will react to specific conditions, we can shape those conditions accordingly.
That is the essence of the modern use of the term “dialectic.”
Now, let’s assume we have achieved a “dialectic” understanding of society — meaning we understand how the masses will react to certain conditions we create. In that case, we can fulfill what Skinner described in his quote:
“We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled, though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free.
This is one of the key principles behind the creation of what I call the “reality of the naïve.”
No one explicitly tells you what to think or what to do. Instead, the conditions are carefully designed to produce the reactions they want — and you simply respond in predictable ways, all the while believing you are acting freely.
PSYOPS
I recently tried to explain to my friend the main PSYOP we have right now in society. I touched on this subject before, and it was mentioned in this video, which I think I used before in my posts.
Anti-ICE Riots Are A Deep State PsyOp!
Conservative activist Laura Loomer weighed in on the ongoing ICE protests in Los Angeles, calling for tech surveillance corporation Palantir to assist in the deportation of immigrants in the country illegally. Many critics took issue with Loomer’s take, pointing out that mass surveillance of the kind practiced by Palantir is far more dangerous than even the presence of millions of migrants.
25:38
“Well, you know, I’ve heard this theory, and this is a little further down the rabbit hole, but you know, I’ve heard people float the theory that actually, the flood of migrants, the flow of migrants from the south up north under Biden, was really intended to create a backlash and bring in a guy like Trump, who could then build this security apparatus under the guise of being strong on immigration. Right. Right. Right. Because it wasn’t just to suppress wages. Because if it was just to suppress wages, then everything you said would be different, right? They’d be taking measures to actually empower people and bring wages back up. But that’s not going to happen. That’s not going to happen. And so, yeah, man, it makes you wonder. It certainly does. Yeah, I do feel that people who are saying that they let all these immigrants in to destabilize society are not wrong. I think they’re just getting one half of the picture. The purpose was to bring in Trump, to bring in someone like Trump who, under the guise of doing something about it, could set up this completely centralized police state and have people deluded into thinking, ‘Yeah, this is about us. This is about looking at the language they’re using. Los Angeles, this once-great city. Really, it’s the immigrants that destroyed Los Angeles. It’s not what’s happened across the entire country: decades of stagnant wages and all of the productivity gains being filtered increasingly to a higher and higher income bracket until now it’s all concentrated in the 1% of income earners that get most of the gains. That’s not what’s destroyed the country. It’s the immigrants.’ Yep. I mean, that’s definitely it. And you know, I’ve made the case many times that open borders, as Bernie Sanders pointed out before he became a complete cuck to the Democratic party, used to be considered by Democrats a Koch brothers operation to suppress wages. So, it does do that, right? It definitely does. It has multiple purposes. The second one being that it keeps us from coming together to organize against the establishment and the oligarchy. So, we keep being angry and fighting at people lower than us on the economic ladder instead of the people creating that situation. And third, and I’m going to guess this, maybe the biggest reason is what you just pointed out: it’s so that they could use it as a reason to expand the surveillance state. It’s like this is the last piece of the puzzle in their surveillance state. It started with 9/11 and the Patriot Act, and this would be the last piece with Palantir, which is why Alex Karp was freaking out so hard.”
This is exactly what I am thinking, and I came to the same conclusions. This is the biggest PSYOP right now in our society, which many people do not understand. I hear people saying it’s Marxism’s fault, which, in my opinion, simply shows how people who think so are manipulated and trapped in this “reality of the naive.”
I already posted about this Marxist narrative, based on, for example, the work of Christian Parenti, son of Michael Parenti. Christian Parenti did great work on how the feminist movement was captured and pushed by the capitalist oligarchic class, and how the Martin Luther King Jr. movement was also captured and pushed by the capitalist oligarchic class—for example, he was sponsored by Rockefeller—and I hope no one will try to tell me Rockefeller was Marxist. I want to spend a little time touching on this narrative because this is what I heard from many people, which I think is complete nonsense. For those interested, I recommend checking out a video by Christian Parenti, which I posted before on this subject. I recently even found another video about it.
– YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
34:47
“This is a dominant narrative, especially from the likes of James Lindsay and a lot of whatever you want to call the alt-right, that all this stuff is just a communist plot or a Marxist plot. They shifted from focusing on class and economy to culture, to ‘transing kids,’ and saying there’s no difference between male and female, and all that stuff.
The argument is that this isn’t just a change in tactic, but that some of that was always the goal: to undermine everything good about ‘Western society’ because they want to make us all ‘world economic blobs,’ like the robots in the movie Wall-E. You’re a dad, so you might have seen Wall-E.
What you’re getting at is that, well, hold on, there could be something else going on behind that that’s more organized. So, if you want to flesh that out a bit, for people who are persuaded by this ‘Cultural Marxist’ argument—because a lot of the people who sign on or play along with some of the really crazy excesses do also say they’re Marxist or Marxist-curious, and a lot of them have intellectual roots or formations from the Frankfurt School, Critical Theory, French theory, etc., whether or not that’s bastardized. So, I guess the first thing is to kind of lay out the argument that this is not Cultural Marxism, or to the extent that the word has some validity, what’s driving it is not people utilizing Marxist-Leninism for political-economic critique.
When I first started to look into this, the key thing is that you have to, when you start working backward, try to look at who’s funding all of this, because it’s clearly not just a grassroots movement. This stuff was clearly being funded; it’s clearly coming down from above. Especially if you look nowadays at things like the ESG stuff—the Environmental, Social, and Governance directives—those are being mandated from the very top of the capitalist class. They’re being pushed by George Soros’s Open Society Institute, and even massive hedge funds like BlackRock are pushing ESGs. This makes you start to think, well, it helps you to understand that this isn’t a grassroots movement. There’s nothing organic about it; it’s being pushed from the top down.
…
Out of that is born, in 1950, the formalization of all of this, which is the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF). And very, very quickly in the 1950s, the CIA, via the Congress for Cultural Freedom and a few other smaller associated programs, very quickly becomes essentially the largest sponsor of intellectual life in the West, and it’s sponsoring academic exchange programs.“
Just like the Martin Luther King Jr. movement was sponsored by Rockefeller—and I hope no one will tell me Rockefeller was Marxist—the same way ESG is being pushed by BlackRock (and I hope no one will tell me that BlackRock is Marxist). I wrote before about Operation Gladio and how the CIA worked with organized crime and Nazis to fight leftist movements.
But besides such fights done by Gladio, they also carried out psychological operations, or PSYOPs, to fight back against leftist movements. This is what Christian Parenti is talking about, and this is also what this video is discussing.
So, just like Martin Luther King Jr.’s marches were sponsored by capitalist oligarchs like Rockefeller, the same way cultural leftist figures like Michel Foucault were sponsored by capitalist oligarchs to distort leftist movements and turn them into the woke culture we see today, which has nothing to do with real Marxism or leftism. Similarly, today, ESG—which is called a leftist or Marxist movement—is being sponsored by BlackRock.
Martin Luther King Jr. is the best example, and I used it in my posts before. MLK was supported by Rockefeller as long as he led marches that divided the working class, because that benefited capitalist oligarchs like Rockefeller. But at the end of his life, he understood he was being used. When he turned to real leftists and Marxism, and decided to organize marches that would unite the working class instead of dividing it, he had to be killed.
As long as MLK divided the working class, he was supported by oligarchs. But when he tried to turn to real left and real Marxism, he had to be killed, which shows that oligarchs like Rockefeller wanted this “woke pseudo-leftist” and cultural Marxism, as long as it weakened real leftism and Marxism.
This is why they supported Michel Foucault and all this woke culture we see now. The MLK example shows that the real left and real Marxism were forbidden; the moment MLK turned to it, he had to be killed. So, this woke culture is not the natural evolution of Marxism and leftist thought, but a sick abomination created by the capitalist class to fight real leftism and Marxism.
As in this video, they say:
1:00:04“One of the interesting things that comes out of the Frankfurt School and a lot of the associated intellectuals are ideas like social critique and intersectionalism.
Intersectionalism is interesting because it’s almost like a perfect ideology for the ruling class, because it targets any form of social solidarity. It says, ‘Okay, you’re not just a person or a worker. You don’t have anything in common with the people around you because, for a start, you’re a woman, so you’re at odds with the other 50% of society.’ But you’re not just a woman; there are all kinds of other things that intersect with that. What you’re doing is immediately destroying any form of social solidarity by putting people into ever smaller boxes.
This is one of the reasons why these intellectual ideas received so much funding: because they’re ultimately very divisive and they make society easier to control. If that’s the nature of your revolution—if your revolution is against the other people in your class—then you’re ultimately going to end up with a group of people who are completely harmless.
In that respect, the ideas that were funded were intensely individual. They really promoted a sense of individuality because it’s easier to control a crowd of individuals than it is to control a group of people who understand that they have a lot in common with each other and that their interests converge and align.
In many ways, you can see how the ideas of rugged individualism were sort of weaponized after the Second World War to mobilize people against socialism.”
I am sorry I spend so much time on this subject, but as they also say in this video:
“I mean, if you spend any time online, you’ll hear people calling the World Economic Forum full of communists.”
I heard this PSYOP narrative so many times, I had to address it. Globalists and neocons, about which I wrote in my posts, are not communists!
Now, going back to this PSYOP. Like Jimmy Dore said:
“It’s like this is the last piece of the puzzle in their surveillance state. It started with 9/11 and the Patriot Act, and this would be the last piece with Palantir.”
He is exactly right, and I wrote about this before. Do you remember Trump being shot? I wrote that it was a PSYOP and was probably organized by people from Palantir like Alex Karp and Peter Thiel to help Trump win. First of all, we didn’t get any answer regarding that shooting. Second, Trump himself stopped the investigation into his shooting. Do you really think he would stop this investigation if this was a real assassination attempt? He was probably told his own people organized it to help him win the election, as I wrote back then, and because of that, he stopped the investigation.
Here you have a clear example of a PSYOP. I explained before why they, in reality, wanted Trump to win. One reason, for example, was that Trump’s tax cuts were ending, and if he did not win, taxes for all those oligarchs would go up, and Democrats would not be able to extend Trump’s tax cuts. This was not the main reason, though. The main reason was the primary PSYOP Jimmy Dore spoke about: implementing the final puzzle of the surveillance state.
Part of this was also the migrant crises in America as well as in Europe. This migrant crisis is part of this dialectic manipulation. They want to implement the final puzzle of this surveillance state, but they can’t simply force it on us. So, they create a condition in which we will ask for it ourselves. As John B. Watson, father of behaviorism, stated, fear—not love—is the guiding force in human society.
It’s the same fear they used after 9/11, which, as I mentioned before, was simply a copy of what Hitler did with burning the Reichstag. After burning his parliament, Hitler passed the “Enabling Act of 1933,” which removed citizens’ rights, similar to Bush’s “Patriot Act.” In both cases, such a thing could not happen normally, since people would protest removing their rights. But if you create specific conditions to scare them in the name of security, they will be willing to do something they normally would not. Hitler burned his parliament and told German people they were threatened by Communist terrorists and that they needed to give up their citizen rights so the Gestapo could protect them, just as Bush organized 9/11 and told Americans they needed to give up their rights so the CIA could protect them from Islamic terrorists.
In both cases, people were frightened enough to give up their rights. Now, what feeling is this migrant crisis causing in the population today? Fear! And this fear will be used, just like in the case of the burned Reichstag and 9/11. Right now, you have people in America who are right-wing and libertarians cheering full surveillance. They are willing to accept digital IDs and flying drones scanning people’s faces to get rid of immigrants. Those same people who protested COVID passports are essentially cheering the same surveillance under the guise of fighting immigration.
This is connected to the work of Whitney Webb, whose interviews I often reference. Here is a quote explaining it:
“The quote from Yarvin about the humane alternative to genocide could indeed align with ideas from certain neugenics groups or figures like Yuval Noah Harari, particularly concerning a post-COVID era. This concept envisions a ‘humane’ method of societal management where, instead of outright killing, individuals deemed undesirable might be placed in pods and immersed in virtual worlds, perhaps akin to the metaverse, where they could remain occupied and content. In this scenario, it might be a corporation that manages these pods, providing sustenance like bug-based protein—’freedom cicadas’—and a Universal Basic Income equivalent, perhaps rebranded as a ‘Liberty Stipend.’ The names of these concepts are likely to be changed, as ideas like ’15-Minute Cities’ are already being rebranded as ‘freedom cities.’ The key is to present these ideas in a way that resonates with different groups, perhaps even suggesting that embracing such technologies is a way to ‘own the libs’ by participating in a technologically advanced future.
Ultimately, many of the underlying policies being advocated for might not be drastically different from pre-existing ones; the primary shift lies in the marketing and the methods used to gain public consent. Similar to the COVID era, significant effort is being invested in manipulating public opinion to accept measures they might otherwise oppose. The same pattern seems to be emerging now with these new proposals.”
They tried to use COVID to implement this final piece of their surveillance puzzle, but they failed. COVID didn’t create enough fear in society to ensure compliance, so they had a plan B: immigration. If COVID was not scary enough to make people accept full surveillance in the name of safety, then they will use immigration to achieve the same goal.
People who created COVID also created the migrant crises with the same purpose: to create fear in society to achieve compliance in the name of safety. People think that by protesting about immigration, they are fighting the same people who created COVID, but the architects of these crises hope that fear of immigration will make people accept the same surveillance they tried to enforce through COVID.
By the way, I am not saying immigration is not a problem, nor that this migrant crisis is not real. But if you are willing to allow full surveillance to fix the problems they created, you are playing into their hands and becoming a useful idiot.
Just like in America, we are starting to have full surveillance and a police state in the name of combating immigration crises and radical leftism. I suspect the same will happen in Europe. Just like they opposed Trump and staged a fake assassination attempt to give him legitimacy, the same pattern may occur in Germany with the AFD. The AFD is not your friend. They will introduce neoliberalism like Trump in America, and they will tell you they will solve the immigration problem in Germany, but to achieve that, Germany will have to allow full surveillance and a police state.
For you to think the AFD is the good guy fighting for you, they need to oppose it now to give it legitimacy, just like with Trump in America. What the AFD will bring to Germany is low taxes for corporations, 5% spending on the military and police state, and full surveillance – but people will vote for them because they are scared of immigration, seeing the AFD as the only solution and they made sure it is the only perceived solution for crises they created are people they want you to pick.
Marketing
Whitney says:
“Ultimately, many of the underlying policies being advocated for might not be drastically different from pre-existing ones; the primary shift lies in the marketing and the methods used to gain public consent.“
I would say this is part of the dialectic: the creation of conditions in which people will do what we want them to do. Dialectic is understanding what people want, and then marketing is used to convince people to want the things we want them to want. People have really short memories, so I would like to show you something that is also part of marketing.
Advanced Warfare Psyops
Lunchbaglujan
I know it may look funny and not serious, but this is also a PSYOP. This woman is literally working in the PSYOP division of the American army. This is marketing and PSYOP, making you imagine this when you think about the Western Army:
Instead of reality, which looks like this:
No Title
No Description
No Title
No Description
No Title
No Description
I bet most of you have forgotten about Abu Ghraib, haven’t you? I wonder why Arabs hate us. I guess it’s because of our freedoms, am I right?
Now, guess what other “thirst traps” worked for the PSYOP division? Some people’s favorite: Tulsi Gabbard.
Just like this, Hailey Lujan is a thirst trap for the military and army. Tulsi Gabbard is a geopolitical thirst trap. Tulsi Gabbard is exactly the kind of marketing Whitney Webb was talking about. Tulsi Gabbard is literally Dick Cheney with a pretty face. People fell for the Tulsi Gabbard PSYOP because she said nice words, while in reality, she is simply Dick Cheney with a pretty face.
“
“…she continued to serve as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard until her transfer to the 351st Civil Affairs Command, a California-based United States Army Reserve unit assigned to the United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, in June 2020.”
”
This woman was working for the PSYOP division of the American army, and people believed she is one of the good guys because she said a few words they wanted to hear. Because she certainly didn’t learn to say what you want to hear in the PSYOP division of the American army just to manipulate you. And I’m sure someone working in the PSYOP division will fight for your right to know the truth and not be manipulated, right? After all, someone working in the Army division, which is responsible for manipulating and lying to people, would never manipulate and lie to you, right?
Thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end of my post. And, as always…
“Knowledge will make you be free.”
― Socrates
+
“Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.”
― Richard P. Feynman
=
“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”
― Grzegorz Ochman
“”The agencies, like some kind of curse, continue side by side and step by step. Gentlemen, when I made this truth my topic, I chose it deliberately and for the sole purpose of dotting the ‘i’ and making sure that no one could say we have to manage the truth about these agencies. Poland may well be facing difficult times ahead. During crises—I repeat—beware of the agencies.”
— Józef Piłsudski
“There is no better breeding ground for the bacteria of falsehood and legends than fear of the truth and lack of will.”
— Józef Piłsudski